If you were charged with resisting arrest in Scottsdale, you may be unsure how the situation became a criminal case so quickly. Many resisting arrest charges begin during a tense encounter with police, where movements, confusion, frustration, or fear can later be described as intentional resistance.
A resisting arrest charge should be taken seriously because Arizona law allows the offense to be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on what the police claim happened. The details matter. The officer’s report, body camera footage, witness statements, and the reason police tried to arrest you can all affect how the case should be defended.
At Diaz Law, we understand that the police report may only tell one version of the story. If you were arrested for resisting arrest in Scottsdale, contact Diaz Law today to schedule a free and confidential consultation and learn how early legal guidance can help protect your rights, your record, and your future.
Under Arizona law, resisting arrest means intentionally preventing or attempting to prevent a person you know, or reasonably should know, is a peace officer from making an arrest. The officer must be acting under color of official authority at the time. Arizona law lists several ways this charge can be based, including physical force, threatened force, conduct that creates a substantial risk of physical injury, or passive resistance.
A resisting arrest case often comes down to what happened in a very short period of time.
The charge may be based on allegations that someone:
A resisting arrest charge is not always based on violence.
Arizona law defines passive resistance as a nonviolent physical act, or failure to act, that is intended to impede, hinder, or delay an arrest. That means a person may face a resisting arrest charge even when the accusation does not involve hitting, pushing, or threatening an officer.
That does not mean every movement during an arrest is automatically a crime. The State still has to prove the required elements of the offense, including intent. In many cases, the defense needs to look closely at whether the person was truly resisting or whether the situation was misunderstood, escalated, or described unfairly after the fact.
Resisting arrest can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor in Arizona. The classification depends on the type of resistance alleged.
Class 6 felony resisting arrest: Resisting arrest is generally a Class 6 felony when the allegation involves using or threatening physical force against an officer or another person. It can also be charged as a Class 6 felony when the conduct allegedly created a substantial risk of physical injury.
Class 1 misdemeanor resisting arrest: If the allegation is based on passive resistance, the offense is classified as a Class 1 misdemeanor under Arizona law. A Class 1 misdemeanor can still carry serious consequences, including up to six months in jail.
The difference between a felony and misdemeanor resisting arrest charge can have a major impact on the case. A felony charge carries more serious long-term consequences, but even a misdemeanor can affect your record, employment, licensing, and future opportunities.
Because the classification depends on the facts, it is important not to assume the charge is accurate simply because it appears on the complaint. Diaz Law can review what officers claim happened and compare that against the evidence, including body camera footage, witness accounts, and the circumstances surrounding the arrest.
Resisting arrest charges often come from fast-moving moments. What feels like confusion, panic, or an instinctive reaction to the person being arrested may later be written in a police report as intentional resistance.
In Scottsdale resisting arrest cases, the accusation may involve claims that someone:
Arizona law also allows resisting arrest to be charged based on passive resistance, which means a nonviolent physical act or failure to act intended to impede, hinder, or delay an arrest.
The officer’s description is important, but it is not the only evidence that matters.
Body camera footage, witness statements, the timing of the arrest, and what happened immediately before officers used force can all change how the situation is understood. In some cases, the defense may need to show that the person was scared, confused, injured, intoxicated, or reacting to the way the arrest unfolded rather than intentionally trying to prevent it.
The possible penalties depend on how the resisting arrest charge is classified. Under Arizona law, resisting arrest based on physical force, threatened force, or conduct that creates a substantial risk of physical injury is a Class 6 felony. Resisting arrest based on passive resistance is a Class 1 misdemeanor.
If the charge is based on passive resistance, the case is still serious even though it is a misdemeanor. A Class 1 misdemeanor in Arizona can carry:
Arizona law sets the maximum jail term for a Class 1 misdemeanor at six months, the maximum fine at $2,500, and the probation period at up to three years.
If the allegation involves force, threatened force, or a substantial risk of injury, resisting arrest can be charged as a Class 6 felony. For a first-time felony offense, Arizona’s sentencing range for a non-dangerous Class 6 felony is generally:
Arizona law also allows felony fines of up to $150,000.
In some eligible Class 6 felony cases, the court may treat the offense as a Class 1 misdemeanor or leave it undesignated during probation before deciding whether it will ultimately be treated as a felony or a misdemeanor. Arizona law also states that an undesignated Class 6 offense must be designated as a misdemeanor after successful completion of probation and discharge, unless certain issues apply.
The legal penalties are only part of the risk. A resisting arrest conviction may also affect employment, professional licensing, background checks, immigration status, and your ability to move forward without the charge following you.
At Diaz Law, the goal is to understand exactly what level of offense you are facing and what can be done to protect your record, your freedom, and your future. A resisting arrest charge can look different once the facts, video footage, and officer conduct are reviewed carefully.
Yes. Resisting arrest is often charged alongside another alleged offense because the charge usually comes from the moment police tried to take someone into custody.
For example, police may first respond to an allegation involving:
Then, if the arrest becomes tense or physical, officers may add a resisting arrest charge based on what they say happened during that encounter.
This means the defense often has to look at two parts of the case. First, why did police get involved? Second, what actually happened during the arrest?
Those issues are connected. If the original investigation was weak, unclear, or escalated too quickly, that may affect how the resisting arrest allegation should be evaluated. The resisting arrest charge should not be treated in isolation when the full timeline tells a more complete story.
A resisting arrest charge often depends on how a fast-moving encounter is described after the fact. The police report may say that a person resisted, but the defense needs to examine what actually happened, what the officer did, and whether the State can prove intent.
Under Arizona law, the State must show that the person intentionally prevented or attempted to prevent a known peace officer from making an arrest. The law also distinguishes between force, conduct creating a substantial risk of injury, and passive resistance.
A defense strategy may focus on issues such as:
At Diaz Law, the defense does not begin and end with the officer’s version of events. Hector Diaz reviews how the encounter unfolded, whether the charge matches the evidence, and whether the facts support a lesser outcome, dismissal, or trial defense.
A resisting arrest charge can feel especially frustrating because it often comes from a tense moment that may have lasted only seconds. Once the charge is filed, however, the consequences can last much longer. That is why the defense has to be careful, strategic, and built around the details.
Diaz Law is led by attorney Hector Diaz, a Scottsdale criminal defense attorney who handles misdemeanor, felony, DUI, white collar, and federal criminal matters. His background includes criminal defense work, strategic media and crisis management, and representation in serious cases where reputation and future consequences are at stake.
Clients choose Diaz Law because they receive:
If you were charged with resisting arrest in Scottsdale, the details of the arrest matter. What happened before the arrest, what commands were given, how officers used force, and what the video shows can all affect how the case should be defended.
The police report may only tell one version of the story. Diaz Law can review the evidence, explain the level of charge you are facing, and help you understand the options available to you.
Contact Diaz Law today to schedule a free no-obligation consultation with a Scottsdale resisting arrest defense lawyer and learn how early legal guidance can help protect your rights, your record, and your future.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. The Diaz Law team is licensed to practice law in Arizona. We invite you to contact us, but please be aware that contacting us does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until an attorney-client relationship has been established.
If you are facing a disorderly conduct charge in Scottsdale, speaking with an attorney early can help protect your rights and position your case for the best possible outcome.
Contact a Scottsdale disorderly conduct attorney today for a free consultation to discuss the details of your case.